Monthly Archives: February 2013


Anyone running a corporate Twitter account might want to keep a very close eye on…

Anyone running a corporate Twitter account might want to keep a very close eye on things

Hacked Fisker Twitter Account Thinks You Need To Lose Some Weight (Updated)
Breaking news from Twitter this afternoon: Fisker Automotive thinks you could stand to lose a few pounds, and they can show you how in just a few short weeks.

Post imported by Google+Blog for WordPress.


McLaren Automotive finally reveals the plug-in hybrid powertrain for the P1 sup… 1

In album

McLaren Automotive finally reveals the plug-in hybrid powertrain for the P1 supercar

Nearly two decades ago when +McLaren Automotive unveiled the F1 it used a +BMW V12 with a then very impressive 618 hp. It was so powerful that when McLaren took the car to Le Mans, they actually had to de-tune it to compete against pure racing machines. Even with it's restricted power production it still took an overall win in the French enduro on its first visit in 1995. 

Today 600+ hp is almost mundane when any schmuck can walk into a +Ford Motor Company dealer and drive off with a 662 hp Shelby GT500 Mustang for a tiny fraction of what the F1 cost. 

Clearly that meant that McLaren needed to dramatically up the ante for the successor P1 that debuts next month in Geneva. The engineers started with the twin-turbo 3.8-liter V8 from the 12C, boosting it from the original 616 hp to 727 hp. But wait! that's not all. They've also added a 176 hp electric motor that adds 192 lb-ft of torque from 0 rpm. The engine has a unique block casting that integrates the motor along the side and blends the output of both power sources into the 7-speed dual clutch transmission. 

Full details of the 97 kg liquid-cooled battery have yet to be revealed but McLaren says it has the highest power density of any such unit in the auto industry today. That probably means it uses lithium cobalt oxide cells like the +Tesla Motors Roadster. 

Around town, the battery and motor can propel the P1 gas-free for about six miles but this setup is clearly optimized for performance. The combined output of the engine and motor is 903 hp and 664 lb-ft, nearly 50% more than the F1. 

THE McLAREN P1™ ADOPTS TWIN POWER TO DELIVER PHENOMENAL TORQUE, INSTANTLY

-IPAS (Instant Power Assist System) and DRS (Drag Reduction System) offer instant boost of power and straight-line speed
-916PS (903 bhp) and 900Nm, with emissions of less than 200g/km
-Substantially revised 3.8-litre twin-turbo V8 petrol engine coupled to low-weight, highly efficient electric motor ensures instant torque for optimised throttle response
-Full E-mode offers in excess of 10km emission-free driving

The McLaren P1™ will have the combined force of two highly-efficient powerplants, offering the optimum mix of superb throttle response, day-to-day drivability and top speed. A mid-mounted 3.8-litre twin-turbo V8 petrol engine and a highly effective electric motor give a combined output of 916PS (903 bhp) and a maximum torque figure of 900Nm, ensuring instantaneous throttle response through the rev range, more akin to a naturally aspirated engine. Emissions of less than 200g/km on the combined cycle are reduced to zero in full electric drive mode, while the Formula 1-derived DRS and IPAS technologies offer an increase in straight-line speed and an instant boost of power.

The 3.8-litre twin-turbo V8 petrol engine in the McLaren P1™ is a new version of the familiar M838T unit, that has been significantly upgraded to optimise cooling and durability under the higher loads. The engine block has a unique casting to incorporate the electric motor. The petrol engine produces 737PS (727 bhp) at 7,500rpm, and 720Nm of torque from 4,000rpm. To optimise efficiency of the petrol engine, extensive testing and development work has always been carried out with McLaren Automotive technology partner Mobil 1 on lubrication and hydraulic fluids.

The lightweight electric motor, developed by the McLaren Electronics arm of the Group, produces 179PS (176 bhp), and is unique to the McLaren P1™. The motor produces maximum torque of 260Nm instantly from a standstill, greatly increasing the throttle response of the McLaren P1™, and peak combined torque of 900Nm is delivered from just 4,000 rpm. In addition to this, the McLaren-developed ‘boost’ system, IPAS, provides up to 179PS instantly. The instant response of the electric motor provides a sharper throttle response more associated with a normally aspirated engine, and the significantly enhanced air-charging system enables the McLaren P1™ to have more top-end power – the perfect combination for high performance.

The electric motor is mounted directly onto the engine, and all drive is channelled through the dual-clutch seven-speed gearbox to drive the rear wheels. Thus, the electric motor and 3.8-litre twin-turbo V8 petrol engine work seamlessly together, providing more than just added ultimate power and torque.

A further benefit is that the e-motor can provide faster upshifts. This is achieved through the application of instant negative torque at the point of shift, making the engine revs drop as quickly and efficiently as possible to the required engine speed for the upshift.

In addition to the obsessive weight-saving measures demonstrated throughout the McLaren P1™, so too is the optimisation of usable energy. When off-throttle the electric motor provides additional drag torque, recovering energy to the battery that would otherwise be lost to the brakes.

E-mode

The McLaren P1™can be driven in a variety of modes, powered by the engine and electric motor together, or solely by the electric motor. This ensures versatility and ease of transportation, allows use in low emission zones and residential driving is optimised with near-silent running.

Maximum power comes when using both powerplants together, but even in E-mode the performance is strong. E-mode is the most economical mode available with zero tailpipe emissions. In E-mode, the McLaren P1™ can travel more than 10km with electric-only power – enough for most city journeys. When the battery is empty, the petrol engine will automatically start to maintain drive and charge the battery.

IPAS and DRS optimise performance and throttle response

The power available via the petrol engine and electric motor is further enhanced on the McLaren P1™ through two steering wheel-mounted buttons which activate the DRS (Drag Reduction System) and IPAS (Instant Power Assist System).

The Drag Reduction System used on the McLaren P1™ is a technology similar to that employed on Formula 1 cars.  Speed is increased by reducing the amount of drag on the rear wing and, where the MP4-28 has a moveable flap on the rear wing, the McLaren P1™ has a wing that reduces in angle to lower drag by 23%. The system immediately deactivates when the button is released, or if the driver touches the brake pedal.

IPAS is designed to deliver power rapidly for high performance acceleration, and provides 179PS of instant additional power. In developing the IPAS technology for the McLaren P1™, power delivery was prioritised over energy storage. This is achieved through a groundbreaking, lightweight battery pack, which offers greater power density than any other automotive battery pack on sale today.

Battery

The high power density has been achieved through a combination of high power cells, low pack weight and an innovative cooling system. The battery weighs just 96kg, and is mounted onto the underbody of the high-strength Formula 1-grade carbon fibre MonoCage chassis, which seals the unit in the vehicle, thus avoiding the added weight of any unnecessary battery packaging.

Due to the amount of power being supplied by the battery, complex cooling is required to guarantee cell performance and reliability. The coolant flow is balanced so each cell is cooled to the same temperature across the entire pack.

In addition to the battery being charged via the engine, the McLaren P1™ is also equipped with a plug-in charger which can recharge the battery, from empty, in only two hours. The plug-in charger can be stored in the luggage compartment, although the customer may choose to store it off-board – in a garage or the pits – to save weight.

Further details of the McLaren P1™ will be released in the coming weeks, before the production-ready car makes its world debut at the Geneva Motor Show next month.

Ends

Post imported by Google+Blog for WordPress.


We should all hope that the US Supreme Court has the good sense to kick Monsanto… 1

We should all hope that the US Supreme Court has the good sense to kick Monsanto to the curb

Unfortunately the rightward lean of this court probably means Monsanto will win this case and we will be stuck paying them an annual tax until the Deamon arrives. http://www.amazon.com/s/?tag=samsthought-20&link_code=wsw&_encoding=UTF-8&search-alias=aps&field-keywords=daemon&Submit.x=0&Submit.y=0&Submit=Go

Farmer vs. biotech: Supreme Court will decide if soybean seeds get copy protection
Today, the Supreme Court is set to begin hearing a case between agrochemical giant Monsanto and a farmer who figured out a way around Monsanto’s strict requirement that its customers buy new…

Post imported by Google+Blog for WordPress.


Pretty amazing site!

Pretty amazing site!

Reshared post from +Ashley Esqueda

So amazing! A pod of over 100K dolphins was spotted off the coast of San Diego this past weekend. The pod stretched for miles! 

http://laist.com/2013/02/18/video_mega-pod_of_100k_dolphins.php

Video of the dolphins, too (it's kind of loud, so turn down your speakers before playing)!

Post imported by Google+Blog for WordPress.


Back in June 2008, I interviewed +Elon Musk for the first time, following his appearance…

Back in June 2008, I interviewed +Elon Musk for the first time, following his appearance on a Fox News segment where he was described as the founder of +Tesla Motors

Those that are interested in Elon Musk might find this discussion interesting. We had an extended conversion about the history of Tesla. All of this came after co-founder Martin Eberhard left the company in fall 2007. These conversations occurred in the wake of a disagreement over the delivery of Martin's Roadster and were followed by a defamation suit by Eberhard against Musk. The suit was ultimately settled and Musk was named as a co-founder.

Part 2 is here http://green.autoblog.com/2008/06/24/autobloggreen-qanda-tesla-motors-chairman-elon-musk-part-2-tran/
Part 3 is here http://green.autoblog.com/2008/06/25/autobloggreen-qanda-tesla-motors-chairman-elon-musk-pt-3-lesso/
and the epilogue is here http://green.autoblog.com/2008/06/26/autobloggreen-qanda-tesla-motors-chairman-elon-musk-epilogue/

AutoblogGreen Q&A: Tesla Motors Chairman Elon Musk Pt. 1 – In the beginning
Among the readers of this site, one of the cars that elicits a lot of passion is the Tesla Roadster. The battery-powered Roadster and its provenance have

Post imported by Google+Blog for WordPress.


Electric vehicle advocate Chelsea Sexton, makes the case for why +Tesla Motors is…

Electric vehicle advocate Chelsea Sexton, makes the case for why +Tesla Motors is doing EVs a disservice with the road trip war

Chelsea has been an advocate for EVs since she worked with General Motors in the 1990s on the EV1 program. In a column on Wired she explains despite Tesla's claims, the Model S is still not a no compromises car but that it also doesn't matter. By putting so much emphasis on its "ability" to do road trips, they take away from what it and other electrics can do so well.  Definitely worth a read. 

Tesla vs. The New York Times: How Range Anxiety Leads to Road (Trip) Rage | Wired Opinion | Wired.com
Though Musk threatens to prove “the truth” with vehicle logs, the New York Times stands by its man, and EV enthusiasts continue to argue the effects of freezing temperatures on EV range and other issu…

Post imported by Google+Blog for WordPress.


If you are still following +Elon Musk's shouting match with the NY Times, read… 5

If you are still following +Elon Musk's shouting match with the NY Times, read this Atlantic Wire analysis of Musk's analysis

Paraphrasing the old line about statistics, "tell me which side of the argument you are on and I'll give you the data to prove you are right". If there is one thing I learned by analyzing test data during my engineering years, it can easily get skewed if you aren't careful with the sensors. 

Doing engineering work the sensors were checked and calibrated on a regular basis to ensure that they were providing accurate readings. Factors such as temperature, age, vibration and more can throw off the readings. In a production car, you don't have this calibration capability and the sensors used generally don't have the same level of precision. The readings you get from the production sensors must be taken with a big chunk of salt. There are algorithms built in to cross check sensors and calculate correction factors, but they work comparatively slowly to avoid sudden fluctuations. 

As a result, changes in temperature for example can throw off things like the model that estimates battery state of charge or even wheel speed calculations as the tire pressure changes.

In self-reporting as writer John Broder did, you can also encounter some errors. Mix these factors together and take things out of context as Musk does repeatedly and you can get the appearance of a lie when there is none. Any competent engineer would spend time pouring over the data and reports and correlating everything so it lined up properly and told the true story. Musk seems to have used the data selectively to bite  back at Broder.

The bottom line would appear to be that Broder did not do everything possible to avoid running out of electrons, but he did appear to follow the directions of +Tesla Motors personnel as much as possible. The Model S is a remarkable piece of engineering but it is far from perfect.

The reality is that for the foreseeable future EV drivers must do more planning than those used to driving internal combustion vehicles even in a Model S with the biggest battery. Even with an ICE you can still run out of gas or diesel if you aren't careful but the results are generally less dire than needing a flatbed. Oh and cold weather will have a major impact on battery performance. 

Elon Musk’s Data Doesn’t Back Up His Claims of New York Times Fakery
Elon Musk’s long-awaited blog post take-down has arrived with what he claims is the data to prove New York Times reporter John M. Broder committed some sort of journalistic malpractice to run a bad re…

Post imported by Google+Blog for WordPress.


This is why you should never rely on some free service you don't control as an… 1

This is why you should never rely on some free service you don't control as an online home for your content

If you want to put your content online and keep it there as an archive, it's best to have your own site or blog that you control. If you use something like Posterous, Tumblr or other free services they can shut down at any time for any reason and there is nothing you can do about. 

Even here on G+, I still maintain my 9-year-old WordPress blog and use +Daniel Treadwell's excellent plug-in to pull in all my posts and comments. From there I can backup, share and control it. If you have your own site, you can still share content to other services like G+, Twitter and Facebook.   

Posterous closing on April 30th to focus on Twitter
It’s almost inevitable as breathing: a tech powerhouse acquires a clever yet small startup solely for its talent or technology, and lets any leftover

Post imported by Google+Blog for WordPress.