A double-edged sword cuts both ways 2


During the hour or so on Tuesday night before the polls closed in California, the numbers seemed to be trending toward a narrow electoral college victory for Barack Obama and a narrow popular vote victory for Mitt Romney. That of course got those on the right-hand side of the spectrum up in arms that Obama would have no real mandate to push his policies forward. 

As the 9 million or so ballots from the Golden state were tallied, that argument quickly evaporated and the Donald Trumps head exploded (wishful thinking on that last part).

Nonetheless, Republicans still tried to maintain the lack of mandate argument based on the narrowed but still healthy majority they managed to win in the house of representatives. Unfortunately for John Boehner and his troops, a look past the surface reveals that even there, the GOP doesn't have a mandate to maintain the obstructionism of the past two years. 

The Republican majority in the house is the direct result of gerrymandering and the highly politicized process of drawing district boundaries. by getting control of so many state legislatures in 2010, Republicans were able to control that process (something Democrats are just as guilty of in the past and even now in places where they are in command).

As a result we have boundaries that are are arbitrarily drawn in such a way that pockets of opposing support are heavily concentrated in fewer districts. The remaining districts are drawn to ensure just enough of a Republican majority to almost guarantee that they will maintain a majority in the house for the next decade (until after the next census and subsequent redistricting). Of course the same thing has been done on the other side in order to ensure the likelihood of some African Americans in congress so there is definitely plenty of blame to go around. 

The bottom line this year is that the latest round of Republican-led gerrymandering has resulted in a mandate-less majority where they have a 233-194 advantage despite the fact that Democratic candidates collectively got 54,301,095 votes while Republicans got 53,822,442. 

Going forward, we need to find a way to take district drawing away from partisan politicians and make the process neutral. 

House Democrats got more votes than House Republicans. Yet Boehner says he’s got a mandate?
Jobs · Real Estate · Rentals · Cars · Print Subscription · Today’s Paper · Discussions · Going Out Guide · Personal Post · Videos · Home · Politics · In Politics · Campaign 2012 · Congress · Court…

Post imported by Google+Blog for WordPress.


Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

2 thoughts on “A double-edged sword cuts both ways

  • sandra skolnik

    Obama won definitively and with a mandate. No way was it 'close' as Boner and his Cantor bots seems to think. Bush selection in 2000 was close. And he didn't even win. Perhaps boner is trying to save face, but there will be no face to save if he continues his hold the line stance.

    If Boner, Cantor and the gang haven't learned their lessons, ie., that We the People said NO to their ideology and platform, then we shall proceed to step 2 in 2014, and step 3 in 2016 until we scatter the GOP far and wide. The signs are there. Republicans – beware ye who enter the halls of Congress with bad intentions. You will fall into the farthest circles of the Inferno.

  • Sam Abuelsamid

    While I'm certainly glad that Obama won, and the victory was definitive, a margin of 50.6 percent to 47.9 can't realistically be called anything but close even if it amounts to 3 million votes overall. I agree he has a mandate, but not a strong one.