politics


MLK and Iraq

On this day when the country is supposed to be observing the anniversary of the birth of Martin Luther King Jr., Juan Cole has a great post about what Dr. King might have said we should do in Iraq. It is based on Dr. King’s “Beyond Vietnam” address of 1967. The same suggestions are just as relevant today, almost 40 years later. Here is a sample:

1. Martin urged the end of the offensive bombing raids.

‘ Number one: End all bombing in North and South Vietnam. ‘

The US has increased the number of its bombing raids in Iraq from 25 a month last summer to 150 in December. Bombing raids are very bad counter-insurgency tactics and should be rethought.

Go read Dr. Cole’s post for the rest. It definitely worthwhile. For those of you who don’t know of Dr. Cole, unlike virtually every so-called “Middle East Expert” you see on TV, Juan Cole is actually fluent in Arabic, Persian and Urdu. This means he can actually read original source material himself and he is actually familiar with the people there really think. If you want some actual rational, informed writing about the Middle East, follow Jaun Cole’s Blog.


Plugging the Analog hole and the threat to democracy!

Ed Felten is a professor of computer science and public affairs at Princeton University. Prof. Felten has done a lot analysis of copy protection schemes (and I use the word schemes in the negative sense, as in schemes to sell snake oil). Over the years he has been sued several times by companies trying to prevent him publishing the results of his studies. Prof. Felten is not an advocate of piracy or a thief. He is not trying to sell anything to anyone. All he is trying to do is inform the public about technology that affects them. Unfortunately this sort of public discussion, about “content protection technologies” is explicitly prohibited by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act which I personally think is unconstitutional, and is definitely one of the worst pieces of legislation ever passed by the United States Congress. Because of the ridiculous provisions in this law, companies have tried to stymie public discussion of flaws in their products.

As we move to a point in time when the current analog tv signals are permanently turned off (currently scheduled for the end of 2008) people who still have current non-digital tv sets will need new digital to analog converter boxes. This point where the digital signal is converter so that it can be viewed is known as the analog hole. This conversion point can be used to copy this digital content. The big media companies desperately want to keep people from copying this content and bypassing their revenue stream. As part of this effort they have enlisted two of their congressional lackeys, James Sensenbrenner of Wisconsin and John Conyers of Michigan to sponsor their Digital Transition Content Security Act. It is interesting that congressmen from WI and MI get such a disproportionate amount of their campaign financing from big entertainment companies, you would think that they would get most of their money from cheese and car companies. The MPAA and RIAA and their friends are the top contributor to Sensenbrenner and no 2 contributor to Conyers.

Prof. Felten has a very interesting post here about a big hole in the anti-analog hole legislation. Basically they want to make an exemption to the protection schemes for “Professional Equipment”. They need this so that the creators of the content can actually copy and create the content. A potential side-effect of this exemption and the way it is worded is that it would close off access to content creation technologies to amateur creators. Besides causing trouble for people who just want to edit their home videos in iMovie, it also potentially closes off access for citizen media to compete with the “mainstream media”(MSM). Given the sorry state of MSM today and the desperate need we have for alternative sources of news, this is a very major problem. Without blogs and podcasts and videocasts, we would be left with the likes of Fox News, and Judith Miller and Bob Woodward. The sources of information would be controlled by a few huge companies and their lackeys in government.

The most essential element to a truly functional democracy, is an informed populace. Without accurate information, people can’t make wise decisions. Forget about piracy. That is just a bogus argument about money and who gets to collect it. Currently that is the distributors of the content, not the creators. The technology we have today is finally allowing the content creators to start profiting from their work, rather than some middleman.

The reason why DRM must be eliminated is because it a grave threat to democracy. Information must be free to flow! People need access to information of all kinds in order for democracy to thrive. We must not let swine like Conyers and Sensenbrenner contribute to the smothering of democracy. Contact these fools and give them a piece of your mind!


Tears?

Here’s a question. Why is it headline news that Sam Alito’s wife left the hearing room in tears earlier this week. The only thing that is relevant hear is the judge’s views on the law and the constitution. This man is extremely dangerous and has no business on any court in this country, much less the supreme court. He is in complete agreement with the idea of a royal presidency. He would reenforce all the outrageous policies of the Bush administration. But what does the media focus on? His wife leaving the room in tears. This is exactly why the main stream media is now completely irrelevant and the sooner that people begin ignoring it and find new sources of “real” news, like blogs, the better off this country will be.


Is this the beginning of the end? 2

Big-time republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff plead guilty in a plea agreement today. Abramoff will become a government witness in on-going investigations of corruption in congress. Tom Delay should be shaking in his boots today. Abramoff will probably bring down some democrats too, but that is a small price to pay to rid this country of a right wing republican led congress.


Top images of 2006

At the end of every year you always see the lists of top images and stories of the past year.  Here are a few of the images I am looking forward to seeing at the end of 2006:

-George W Bush being convicted at his impeachment trial

-Karl Rove’s perp walk and subsequent conviction in the Valerie Plame leak case

-Republicans loosing control of both houses of congress in November

-Tom Delay convicted on all charges in his corruption trial

-the final US troops returning from Iraq

-the RIAA announcing all file sharing lawsuits are dropped and previous settlements are refunded

-Record companies announcing they will never use DRM again and repudiating the DMCA

-prices of online music downloads being reduced to the point ($.20-$.25 per song) where file sharing of music becomes pointless except for old out of print recordings.

-More people listening to podcasts than Clear Channel radio stations

-The Thomas Moore Law center is disbanded and all intelligent design efforts are abandoned.

-Software and business model patents are ruled invalid and are permanently rejected

Clearly some of these items fall into the realm of fantasy (like the RIAA giving up on drm),  but some are definitely things that could happen this year.  What are some images or stories you would like to look back on come December 31 2006?


George W Bush is a Liar!

In a speech in April 2004 in Buffalo NY, addressing concerns about the USA Patriot Act George W. Bush said:

“A wiretap requires a court order. Nothing has changed by the way.”

Bush clearly lied to the American people when he made that statement. They are running the video on CNN right now.


Some Common Sense

So clearly the judge in the Dover, PA, intelligent design lawsuit is an “Activist” judge. U.S. District Judge John Jones today ruled that ID is not science but rather a supernatural explanation for the origin of life and is nothing more than a thinly disguised version of biblical creationism. He was quite open in his criticism of the ID proponents:

Jones condemned the “breathtaking inanity” of the policy of the board, all but one of whom have now been ousted by local voters. “Any asserted secular purposes by the Board are a sham and are merely secondary to a religious objective,” he said.

Jones said the students and teachers of Dover High School “deserved better than to be dragged into this legal maelstrom with its resulting utter waste of monetary and personal resources.”

Fortunately the members of the Dover school board who put this policy were ejected by the voters this fall, so hopefully this case will not get appealed. Undoubtedly other similar cases will follow, particularly in Kansas that has a statewide rather local policy on ID. Lets just hope that the same kind of rulings follow.


George Bush should be Impeached Immediately!

This is the oath of office that is taken by someone when they become president of the United States:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.

Note it says the president will “preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States”. George Bush has consistently done none of this during his time in office. In fact he has actively tried to undermine the constitution. He has declared US citizens to be enemy combatants and held them in military jails with out access to legal counsel, without access to the evidence against them and without charging them with a crime, he has undermined the bill of rights and the rule of law. He has lead the country into an illegal invasion of a sovereign country that has resulted in the deaths of over 2130 American soldiers and tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians all based on bogus intelligence. He has reduced the security this country by abrogating our treaty obligations under the Geneva Conventions. By snatching people off of city streets, flying them off to third countries that don’t mind harboring secret CIA prisons so these prisoners can be tortured, he has shown the current administration to be no better than all the other “evil” dictatorships that we have condemned over the years. As a result any claim we previously had to moral authority on the issue of torture has been discarded. People around the world that used to look up to the United States and respect our commitment to justice and the rule of law now see us as just another bully.

He has shown utter disdain for the premise of the first amendment by trying to push his faith-based initiatives.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

And now comes this. Apparently during a meeting in November 2005 with republican congressional leaders the following transpired:

GOP leaders told Bush that his hardcore push to renew the more onerous provisions of the act could further alienate conservatives still mad at the President from his botched attempt to nominate White House Counsel Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court.

“I don’t give a goddamn,” Bush retorted. “I’m the President and the Commander-in-Chief. Do it my way.”

“Mr. President,” one aide in the meeting said. “There is a valid case that the provisions in this law undermine the Constitution.”

“Stop throwing the Constitution in my face,” Bush screamed back. “It’s just a goddamned piece of paper!”

If he did make these statements, and Doug Thompson of capitol hill blue says 3 different people present at the meeting have confirmed it, then Bush is clearly not fit for office because he has no interest in defending the constitution. I urge you to follow the link and read the rest of the piece. It appears that Bush now truly believes that he is the king.

IMPEACH BUSH NOW! If we start now, we can begin to repair the reputation of the United States as a defender of truth and justice, and maybe in a generation we can undo some of the damage George W Bush has done to America.


Salon.com | Ten ways to argue about the war

The lead piece on Salon.com this morning outlines Ten ways to argue about the war. It summarizes responses to most of the common questions from adovcates of the war. For example here is the first one:

“I read your article on withdrawal of American troops,” my correspondent began, “and questioned the lack of discussion of the following…” (His comments are in bold.)

1. Nothing was mentioned about improvements in Iraq (elections, water and energy, schools). No Saddam to fear! Water and energy delivery as well as schools are worse off than before the U.S. invasion. Ditto for the state of hospitals (and medical supplies), highways and oil production. Elections are a positive change, but the elected government does not have more than a semblance of actual sovereignty, and therefore the Iraqi people have no power to make real choices about their future. One critical example: The Shiite/Kurdish political coalition now in power ran on a platform whose primary promise was that, if elected, they would set and enforce a timetable for American withdrawal. As soon as they took power, they reneged on this promise (apparently under pressure from the United States). They have also proved quite incapable of fulfilling their other campaign promises about restoring services and rebuilding the country; and for that reason (as well as others), their constituents (primarily the Shiites) are becoming ever more disillusioned. In the most recent polls, Shiite Iraqis now are about 70 percent in favor of U.S. withdrawal.

There are nine more, and they give good reponses to the various misinformation statements that war supporters usually have.

Also did you hear what Iyad Allawi said last week about the situation in Iraq? Don’t forget Allawi was the guy hand-picked by the Bush administration to lead Iraq after the “turnover of sovereignty to the Iraqi’s”. This means that he is nominally one of “Our Guys” over there. In an interview with the Observer last week he said:

November 27,2005 | LONDON — Human rights abuses in Iraq are as bad now as they were under Saddam Hussein and could become even worse, the country’s former interim prime minister said in an interview published Sunday.

“People are doing the same as Saddam’s time and worse,” Ayad Allawi told The Observer newspaper. “It is an appropriate comparison.”

Allawi accused fellow Shiites in the government of being responsible for death squads and secret torture centers and said the brutality of elements in the new security forces rivals that of Saddam’s secret police.

Although Allawi is a Shiite, he is secular in his politics and is running separately from the Shiite religious parties in the Dec. 15 election. His comments appear to be an attempt to appeal to Sunni voters, who claim their community has been unfairly targeted by the Shiite-led security forces.

“People are remembering the days of Saddam. These were the precise reasons that we fought Saddam and now we are seeing the same thing,” the newspaper quoted him as saying.

Iraqi officials have played down reports of rights abuses, insisting they are lies created by their enemies.

So now that we know there were no weapons or links to 9/11 and the only argument we have left for the invasion was to remove a tyrant, we find that now we are the tyrant.