cars


McLaren Automotive finally reveals the plug-in hybrid powertrain for the P1 sup… 1

In album

McLaren Automotive finally reveals the plug-in hybrid powertrain for the P1 supercar

Nearly two decades ago when +McLaren Automotive unveiled the F1 it used a +BMW V12 with a then very impressive 618 hp. It was so powerful that when McLaren took the car to Le Mans, they actually had to de-tune it to compete against pure racing machines. Even with it's restricted power production it still took an overall win in the French enduro on its first visit in 1995. 

Today 600+ hp is almost mundane when any schmuck can walk into a +Ford Motor Company dealer and drive off with a 662 hp Shelby GT500 Mustang for a tiny fraction of what the F1 cost. 

Clearly that meant that McLaren needed to dramatically up the ante for the successor P1 that debuts next month in Geneva. The engineers started with the twin-turbo 3.8-liter V8 from the 12C, boosting it from the original 616 hp to 727 hp. But wait! that's not all. They've also added a 176 hp electric motor that adds 192 lb-ft of torque from 0 rpm. The engine has a unique block casting that integrates the motor along the side and blends the output of both power sources into the 7-speed dual clutch transmission. 

Full details of the 97 kg liquid-cooled battery have yet to be revealed but McLaren says it has the highest power density of any such unit in the auto industry today. That probably means it uses lithium cobalt oxide cells like the +Tesla Motors Roadster. 

Around town, the battery and motor can propel the P1 gas-free for about six miles but this setup is clearly optimized for performance. The combined output of the engine and motor is 903 hp and 664 lb-ft, nearly 50% more than the F1. 

THE McLAREN P1™ ADOPTS TWIN POWER TO DELIVER PHENOMENAL TORQUE, INSTANTLY

-IPAS (Instant Power Assist System) and DRS (Drag Reduction System) offer instant boost of power and straight-line speed
-916PS (903 bhp) and 900Nm, with emissions of less than 200g/km
-Substantially revised 3.8-litre twin-turbo V8 petrol engine coupled to low-weight, highly efficient electric motor ensures instant torque for optimised throttle response
-Full E-mode offers in excess of 10km emission-free driving

The McLaren P1™ will have the combined force of two highly-efficient powerplants, offering the optimum mix of superb throttle response, day-to-day drivability and top speed. A mid-mounted 3.8-litre twin-turbo V8 petrol engine and a highly effective electric motor give a combined output of 916PS (903 bhp) and a maximum torque figure of 900Nm, ensuring instantaneous throttle response through the rev range, more akin to a naturally aspirated engine. Emissions of less than 200g/km on the combined cycle are reduced to zero in full electric drive mode, while the Formula 1-derived DRS and IPAS technologies offer an increase in straight-line speed and an instant boost of power.

The 3.8-litre twin-turbo V8 petrol engine in the McLaren P1™ is a new version of the familiar M838T unit, that has been significantly upgraded to optimise cooling and durability under the higher loads. The engine block has a unique casting to incorporate the electric motor. The petrol engine produces 737PS (727 bhp) at 7,500rpm, and 720Nm of torque from 4,000rpm. To optimise efficiency of the petrol engine, extensive testing and development work has always been carried out with McLaren Automotive technology partner Mobil 1 on lubrication and hydraulic fluids.

The lightweight electric motor, developed by the McLaren Electronics arm of the Group, produces 179PS (176 bhp), and is unique to the McLaren P1™. The motor produces maximum torque of 260Nm instantly from a standstill, greatly increasing the throttle response of the McLaren P1™, and peak combined torque of 900Nm is delivered from just 4,000 rpm. In addition to this, the McLaren-developed ‘boost’ system, IPAS, provides up to 179PS instantly. The instant response of the electric motor provides a sharper throttle response more associated with a normally aspirated engine, and the significantly enhanced air-charging system enables the McLaren P1™ to have more top-end power – the perfect combination for high performance.

The electric motor is mounted directly onto the engine, and all drive is channelled through the dual-clutch seven-speed gearbox to drive the rear wheels. Thus, the electric motor and 3.8-litre twin-turbo V8 petrol engine work seamlessly together, providing more than just added ultimate power and torque.

A further benefit is that the e-motor can provide faster upshifts. This is achieved through the application of instant negative torque at the point of shift, making the engine revs drop as quickly and efficiently as possible to the required engine speed for the upshift.

In addition to the obsessive weight-saving measures demonstrated throughout the McLaren P1™, so too is the optimisation of usable energy. When off-throttle the electric motor provides additional drag torque, recovering energy to the battery that would otherwise be lost to the brakes.

E-mode

The McLaren P1™can be driven in a variety of modes, powered by the engine and electric motor together, or solely by the electric motor. This ensures versatility and ease of transportation, allows use in low emission zones and residential driving is optimised with near-silent running.

Maximum power comes when using both powerplants together, but even in E-mode the performance is strong. E-mode is the most economical mode available with zero tailpipe emissions. In E-mode, the McLaren P1™ can travel more than 10km with electric-only power – enough for most city journeys. When the battery is empty, the petrol engine will automatically start to maintain drive and charge the battery.

IPAS and DRS optimise performance and throttle response

The power available via the petrol engine and electric motor is further enhanced on the McLaren P1™ through two steering wheel-mounted buttons which activate the DRS (Drag Reduction System) and IPAS (Instant Power Assist System).

The Drag Reduction System used on the McLaren P1™ is a technology similar to that employed on Formula 1 cars.  Speed is increased by reducing the amount of drag on the rear wing and, where the MP4-28 has a moveable flap on the rear wing, the McLaren P1™ has a wing that reduces in angle to lower drag by 23%. The system immediately deactivates when the button is released, or if the driver touches the brake pedal.

IPAS is designed to deliver power rapidly for high performance acceleration, and provides 179PS of instant additional power. In developing the IPAS technology for the McLaren P1™, power delivery was prioritised over energy storage. This is achieved through a groundbreaking, lightweight battery pack, which offers greater power density than any other automotive battery pack on sale today.

Battery

The high power density has been achieved through a combination of high power cells, low pack weight and an innovative cooling system. The battery weighs just 96kg, and is mounted onto the underbody of the high-strength Formula 1-grade carbon fibre MonoCage chassis, which seals the unit in the vehicle, thus avoiding the added weight of any unnecessary battery packaging.

Due to the amount of power being supplied by the battery, complex cooling is required to guarantee cell performance and reliability. The coolant flow is balanced so each cell is cooled to the same temperature across the entire pack.

In addition to the battery being charged via the engine, the McLaren P1™ is also equipped with a plug-in charger which can recharge the battery, from empty, in only two hours. The plug-in charger can be stored in the luggage compartment, although the customer may choose to store it off-board – in a garage or the pits – to save weight.

Further details of the McLaren P1™ will be released in the coming weeks, before the production-ready car makes its world debut at the Geneva Motor Show next month.

Ends

Post imported by Google+Blog for WordPress.


New Cadillac ELR retains current Chevy Volt powertrain with software tweaks including… 4

In album

New Cadillac ELR retains current Chevy Volt powertrain with software tweaks including Regen on Demand

Cadillac finally revealed the ELR coupe to the world yesterday and as expected, it hasn't really diverged much from the original plan. It looks almost exactly like the original and stunning Converj concept from 2009 although the wheelbase and track have grown ever so slightly. 

Contrary to some wild and unfounded speculation last spring it also doesn't have a new powertrain or 2.0-liter turbocharged range extender. https://plus.google.com/u/0/114133424228405038490/posts/3vNw81KUr3T

In fact, the hardware bits are essentially identical to the slightly updated hardware that debuted in the Volt last summer including the revised battery chemistry that upped the capacity from 16 to 16.5 kWh. However, all the expected amenities that make this a Cadillac including the 20-inch wheels, mean this car weighs 300 pounds more than a Volt. In order to provide the performance boost people expect from a Cadillac and still maintain the electric range they would want from this type of car, the engineers took advantage of the real world experience they have gained with the Volt over the past 2.5 years.

The traction motor has been recalibrated to provide some extra output, now 117-135 kW depending on the mode the driver selects including the available sport setting. Now that the GM has more confidence in the durability of its battery system, the ELR is now also using more of the available capacity to retain a 35 mile electric driving range. In fact, I would be surprised if GM doesn't make those latter adjustments to the 2014 Volt software to boost it's range by a few more miles. 

One other aspect that is exclusive to the Cadillac is Regen on Demand. Most cars in this segment with automatic transmissions have steering wheel mounted paddle shifters that the driver can tap to downshift and get some extra engine braking going into corners or downhill. With its single speed gearbox, this obviously isn't an option on the ELR. However,tapping its paddles allows the driver to get some short pulses of regenerative braking when desired, providing a similar effect to quick downshift without touching the brake pedal.

Definitely a rather nifty touch although for a likely price of $65-70,000 such details are needed. #NAIAS  

Post imported by Google+Blog for WordPress.


Will the second generation Chevy Volt shift more toward the plug-in hybrid path?

Will the second generation Chevy Volt shift more toward the plug-in hybrid path?

If this article from the UK-based AutoExpress is to be believed, GM will opt for a smaller battery for the second generation Vauxhall/Opel Ampera and presumably the near identical +Chevrolet Volt. The story quotes Thomas Sedran, GM’s Vice President of Strategy and Operations as saying 18-30 miles of electric range is sufficient compared to the 25-50 miles the current model is capable of. 

Going with a 40% smaller battery would allow the engineers to drop about 150 pounds and probably several thousand dollars of cost.  Re-configuring the current T-shaped battery pack would also potentially allow the designers to add accommodations for a third passenger in the back seat addressing one of the biggest complaints against the Volt. 

The weight reduction and a new more efficient range extender engine would lead to improved fuel efficiency in charge sustaining mode. GM is also no doubt learning lessons from both current Volt customers and its competitors.  

The current electric range of approximately 40 miles was selected based on data that said 75% of drivers go less than that on a daily basis. The 30,000+ Volts and Amperas on the road already are feeding back a lot of usage data to the OnStar databases. GM has probably found that the shorter range would still meet the requirements of the way drivers are actually using these vehicles. 

More importantly the shorter range would still allow GM to complete the EPA driving cycles without running the engine, in the same way that Ford is able to do with the Fusion Energi and C-MAX Energi. The reduced weight would help the hybrid mode mileage allowing the new Volt to get much better label numbers than the current model. 

Next Vauxhall Ampera to get shorter range
The next-generation Ampera could feature a smaller battery and shorter range in a bid to drive down the price

Post imported by Google+Blog for WordPress.


Ford talks about the real world fuel efficiency of its latest hybrids On Friday, while +Ford Motor Company…

Ford talks about the real world fuel efficiency of its latest hybrids

On Friday, while +Ford Motor Company was showing off its new lineup of Transit and Transit Connect vans, VP of product development Raj Nair took a few minutes to discuss some recent reports on the fuel efficiency of the C-MAX and Fusion hybrids. There have been numerous reports that customers are falling short of the EPA label estimates in real world driving. 

For those of us that have been paying attention, it's been pretty clear for many years that hybrid vehicles can exhibit a great deal of variability depending on the driving conditions. Back in late 2010 when I was working at GM and they were launching the Volt, they spoke extensively of the 3 Ts and how they would affect the electric driving ranging. 

Those 3 Ts are terrain, temperature and technique. All vehicles get worse mileage in winter for a variety of reasons http://green.autoblog.com/2009/11/12/greenlings-why-does-mileage-drop-in-winter/ but hybrids are particularly sensitive because battery performance is reduced as the temperature drops (or gets too high for that matter).

As the boys from Top Gear demonstrated a few years back when they raced a Prius against an M3, driving aggressively in a hybrid will also degrade efficiency because the engines are  tuned to operate best under the light loads typical of the driving cycles used to estimate efficiency.

Nair talked about these factors as well as break-in effects when he spoke to media. He specifically mentioned a 5 mpg improvement as the vehicles go beyond 6,000 miles on the road. Since the C-MAX and Fusion haven't been on sale for very long yet, they will probably get better as time passes. A check of the user submitted numbers on fueleconomy.gov http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=33010&id=33083 already shows the averages climbing from where they were just a couple of weeks ago. 


Ford talks about the real world fuel efficiency of its latest hybrids

On Friday, while +Ford Motor Company was showing off its new lineup of Transit and Transit Connect vans, VP of product development Raj Nair took a few minutes to discuss some recent reports on the fuel efficiency of the C-MAX and Fusion hybrids. There have been numerous reports that customers are falling short of the EPA label estimates in real world driving. 

For those of us that have been paying attention, it's been pretty clear for many years that hybrid vehicles can exhibit a great deal of variability depending on the driving conditions. Back in late 2010 when I was working at GM and they were launching the Volt, they spoke extensively of the 3 Ts and how they would affect the electric driving ranging. 

Those 3 Ts are terrain, temperature and technique. All vehicles get worse mileage in winter for a variety of reasons http://green.autoblog.com/2009/11/12/greenlings-why-does-mileage-drop-in-winter/ but hybrids are particularly sensitive because battery performance is reduced as the temperature drops (or gets too high for that matter).

As the boys from Top Gear demonstrated a few years back when they raced a Prius against an M3, driving aggressively in a hybrid will also degrade efficiency because the engines are  tuned to operate best under the light loads typical of the driving cycles used to estimate efficiency.

Nair talked about these factors as well as break-in effects when he spoke to media. He specifically mentioned a 5 mpg improvement as the vehicles go beyond 6,000 miles on the road. Since the C-MAX and Fusion haven't been on sale for very long yet, they will probably get better as time passes. A check of the user submitted numbers on fueleconomy.gov http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=33010&id=33083 already shows the averages climbing from where they were just a couple of weeks ago. 

Embedded Link

Green Car Congress: Ford’s math on hybrid fuel economy; standing by the C-MAX EPA ratings, acknowledging large real-world variance
Online news, features and analysis

Post imported by Google+Blog for WordPress.


This is an example of a real innovation that could justify patents 4

Anyone that follows my commentary, knows that I'm not a fan of patents. I truly believe that the concept has outlived its usefulness and the costs now vastly outweigh the benefits. 

That said if we have to grant patents, this is a great example of the sort of idea that should be recognized (assuming of course that there isn't prior art).  Engineers from +General Motors and the University of Michigan including Paul Najt who I interviewed on several occasions during my years as a journalist at AutoblogGreen have come up with an interesting new way of powering an extended range electric vehicle like the +Chevrolet Volt.

Because of the very short four-year development cycle for the Volt, the engineering team opted to use a conventional and proven 1.4-liter four-cylinder reciprocating engine to drive the generator once the battery has been depleted of energy from the plug. While this setup works remarkably well, it's not necessarily the most efficient setup for running in charge-sustaining mode, hence the Volt's 37 mpg EPA rating in this mode.

During and beyond the development phase of the first-generation Volt, engineers at GM R&D and Powertrain have been working on a wide range of alternative powerplants for use with the ER-EV Voltec system. http://amzn.to/QiSPQF

These alternatives include conventional diesels, Wankel rotaries, hydrogen fuel cells, HCCI and other less well known types. Among those options are free-piston engines http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/news/industry/5-alternative-engine-architectures#slide-4

There are a number of ways to implement the free-piston concept but all of them involve a piston that "bounces" back and forth between a pair of combustion chambers that alternate firing. While it's possible to use this architecture in a completely mechanical form by linking the pistons to drive a transmission, the patented concept here converts combustion energy to electricity. 

By incorporating magnets and coils into the oscillating piston and the stationary cylinder, the motion can be used generate electricity. A free-piston layout inherently has lower friction than a traditional design. The mechanical simplicity means that engineers can set up a modular configuration several independent engine/generators that can be turned on or  off as needed based on transient power needs.

Because each generator operates independently, there are no frictional losses from the modules that aren't running. The result is potentially significantly improved overall efficiency in charge sustaining mode as well as greater packaging flexibility. It will be interesting to see if this idea ever goes beyond the concept stage. 

Via GreenCar Congress http://www.greencarcongress.com/2012/11/fpla-20121125.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+greencarcongress%2FTrBK+%28Green+Car+Congress%29

US 8261860 B2 Hybrid powertrain system using free piston linear …
US 8261860 B2. Hybrid powertrain system using free piston linear alternator engines. Paul M. Najt, Bloomfield Hills, Mich. (US); Tang-Wei Kuo, Troy, Mich. (US); Rodney B. Rask, Grosse Pointe Woods, Mi…

Post imported by Google+Blog for WordPress.


Even when Apple supports standards, they often don't do it right 3

Ford SYNC and MyFord Touch connectivity offer the ability to read incoming text messages from paired phones that support the function.

iOS 6 is supposed to support MAP, but it doesn't seem to work. I could see the functionality on the C-Max Hybrid's phone screen, but when I tried to send one of the canned text messages with my paired iPhone 5, it didn't go through. According to a Ford representative, Apple did not implement MAP according to the specification. Ford is currently looking at making its cars work with Apple's particular Bluetooth implementation for text messages.

My own experience trying this with an iPhone was also unsuccessful. Other than that, the C-Max is a very cool vehicle. 

Reshared post from +CNET

Ford's Prius-beater hybrid boasts better handling and power. We named it a CNET Editor's Choice:

2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid
With fuel economy in the high 40s and a roomy interior, the 2013 C-Max Hybrid looks equivalent to the Toyota Prius, until you get behind the wheel and tap the extra power.

Post imported by Google+Blog for WordPress.


Dennis Simanaitis on useful and not so good automotive tech

The great Dennis Simanaitis comments on some current automotive technology and whether it is good or bad. I largely agree with his assessments. However, in the case of lane departure warning and park assist, while neither is really needed, the tech at the heart of these capabilities are building blocks to future autonomous driving capability. 

While I love to drive, I see autonomous vehicles as an important development for safety and efficiency in the future. 

HIGH TECH, WHY TECH
AVOWED TECHIE though I am, some modern automotive offerings have me wondering. Here are my current citations in both categories, High Tech and Why Tech. Rear view camera. High Tech! … Contin…

Post imported by Google+Blog for WordPress.


Apparently I'm not the only one thinking of a diesel-flywheel-hybrid Audi su…

Apparently I'm not the only one thinking of a diesel-flywheel-hybrid Audi supercar

UK magazine Autocar is reporting today that +Audi International is working on a plans for a supercar powered by a diesel engine with a flywheel-hybrid-electric system much like the Le Mans-winning R18 e-tron quattro. About a month ago I speculated pretty much the same thing https://plus.google.com/114133424228405038490/posts/jD87pkgvvP6 following the rumors that Audi was scuttling it's plans to build a battery-electric version of the R8. 

The difference here is that Audi is guessing that this diesel hybrid would be a new model above the R8. It's entirely possible that such a model could be derived from the R8 platform while gaining a new name like R10.  I'd certainly love to try out a car like this regardless of what it's called. 

Audi R10 diesel hypercar plotted | Autocar
Audi is planning to build a diesel hypercar, using Le Mans-developed hybrid technology

Post imported by Google+Blog for WordPress.


C&D tries out the new Ford C-Max Energi

Csaba Csere of +Car and Driver Magazine recently spent a day with the new +Ford Motor Company C-Max Energi around San Francisco and came away pretty impressed.  For those that really want to take advantage of more zero emission driving capability, the 118 hp electric motor and 7.2 kWh battery gives better capability and range than the Prius PHV and the tall wagon bodystyle is a lot more useful than the Chevy Volt. The C-Max is also cheaper than its competitors. 

There was one error in Csaba's review however. The C-Max is built on the platform of the Focus, not the smaller Fiesta. 

Reshared post from +Car and Driver Magazine

We take the 2013 Ford C-Max Energi plug-in hybrid to the streets to see how it stacks up to the plug-in competition. http://cardrive.co/6033pkpb

Post imported by Google+Blog for WordPress.