Paraphrasing the old line about statistics, "tell me which side of the argument you are on and I'll give you the data to prove you are right". If there is one thing I learned by analyzing test data during my engineering years, it can easily get skewed if you aren't careful with the sensors.
Doing engineering work the sensors were checked and calibrated on a regular basis to ensure that they were providing accurate readings. Factors such as temperature, age, vibration and more can throw off the readings. In a production car, you don't have this calibration capability and the sensors used generally don't have the same level of precision. The readings you get from the production sensors must be taken with a big chunk of salt. There are algorithms built in to cross check sensors and calculate correction factors, but they work comparatively slowly to avoid sudden fluctuations.
As a result, changes in temperature for example can throw off things like the model that estimates battery state of charge or even wheel speed calculations as the tire pressure changes.
In self-reporting as writer John Broder did, you can also encounter some errors. Mix these factors together and take things out of context as Musk does repeatedly and you can get the appearance of a lie when there is none. Any competent engineer would spend time pouring over the data and reports and correlating everything so it lined up properly and told the true story. Musk seems to have used the data selectively to bite back at Broder.
The bottom line would appear to be that Broder did not do everything possible to avoid running out of electrons, but he did appear to follow the directions of +Tesla Motors personnel as much as possible. The Model S is a remarkable piece of engineering but it is far from perfect.
The reality is that for the foreseeable future EV drivers must do more planning than those used to driving internal combustion vehicles even in a Model S with the biggest battery. Even with an ICE you can still run out of gas or diesel if you aren't careful but the results are generally less dire than needing a flatbed. Oh and cold weather will have a major impact on battery performance.
Elon Musk’s Data Doesn’t Back Up His Claims of New York Times Fakery
Elon Musk’s long-awaited blog post take-down has arrived with what he claims is the data to prove New York Times reporter John M. Broder committed some sort of journalistic malpractice to run a bad re…
This post has been reshared 1 times on Google+
View this post on Google+
Post imported by Google+Blog for WordPress.
+Leland LeCuyer Part Deux!
+David Amerland 😉
I'm not sure why anyone cares about these silly road trips. Any time I go somewhere 500+ miles away, I fly. In the extremely rare case that I would want to drive hundreds of miles away, a rental gas car works and is cheap.
EV range is only a real problem when your minimum range under bad conditions does not meet or exceed your maximum driving you might do in town on a given day. The LEAF and other cheaper EVs have this problem: with a 100mi average range, you can probably count on a minimum of 70mi in bad conditions, and for me, I need a minimum of 120mi to match the maximum driving I might do inside my city in one day. The expensive Teslas with huge battery packs don't really have this problem. You just give up road trips to gain the ability to get very high MPGe and high performance driving at the same time, which you can't get from a conventional hybrid.
There are trade-offs no matter what type of car you pick.
Chris, under bad conditions the LEAF could be under 50 miles, not 70. Also, the only thing you need to know about that Broder guy is that other people have taken the same drive from DC to Boston and made it just fine. If everyone else is fine, and he wasn't, who is the tool?
Another data point: several Model S owners retraced Broder's route and made it without any range issues.
http://fearlessbit.com/2013/02/18/taking-a-road-trip-in-the-tesla-model-s/