While this is almost certainly not illegal, it's certainly unethical 16


That said I wouldn't try to ban anyone from encouraging others who to vote for because that would also affect those that I support and free speech is more important than control. 

What must happen is that we eliminate these tax-exempt super-PACs and also require full disclosure of all donors and how much they are spending.  Everyone should have the same opportunity to speak, but we should know who is trying to buy our elections. 

Finally, this case involves the National Federation of Independent Business which broke off from the US Chamber of Commerce because they thought that organization was "too progressive"

Reshared post from +Susan Stone

Another site talking about this…

Leaked Audio Captures Romney Asking Employers To Tell Their Employees How To Vote
Newly-discovered audio from a conference call in June captures Mitt Romney asking business owners to urge their employees to vote for him. Romney, speaking on a call to the very conservative National …

Post imported by Google+Blog for WordPress.


Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

16 thoughts on “While this is almost certainly not illegal, it's certainly unethical

  • Ryan Kiefer

    Yes, yes, 1000 times yes… it isn't necessary for romney to ask the wealthy business owners to vote for him, because repub politics always favor the wealthy, but using one's influence as a c-level exec to drive people away from voting as they want is damned unethical. It doesn't matter if he isn't actually threatening jobs…. the threat is implied because he has power over you.

  • Ryan Kiefer

    Yes, yes, 1000 times yes… it isn't necessary for romney to ask the wealthy business owners to vote for him, because repub politics always favor the wealthy, but using one's influence as a c-level exec to drive people away from voting as they want is damned unethical. It doesn't matter if he isn't actually threatening jobs…. the threat is implied because he has power over you.

  • Dennis D. McDonald

    +Dave Booth The other typical rejoinder to this type of thing is "But look at what the Black churches do…"

    I still think that threatening to fire someone for voting one way or another is especially vile when financially vulnerable people are involved, but we live in a world where "false equivalency" is an accepted practice.

  • Dennis D. McDonald

    +Dave Booth The other typical rejoinder to this type of thing is "But look at what the Black churches do…"

    I still think that threatening to fire someone for voting one way or another is especially vile when financially vulnerable people are involved, but we live in a world where "false equivalency" is an accepted practice.

  • Sam Abuelsamid

    I think what's most important is absolute transparency. Clearly churches of colors and creeds and unions try to influence their members in politics. 

    The problem we face today is corporate influence that tries extremely hard to stay in the background. Executives need to step out into the sunlight and make their arguments where EVERYONE can hear them and judge just as union and religious leaders typically do. 

    One of the most insidious aspects of today's political arena is the tens and hundreds of millions of dollars being spent without any indication of where the money originated from. 

  • Sam Abuelsamid

    I think what's most important is absolute transparency. Clearly churches of colors and creeds and unions try to influence their members in politics. 

    The problem we face today is corporate influence that tries extremely hard to stay in the background. Executives need to step out into the sunlight and make their arguments where EVERYONE can hear them and judge just as union and religious leaders typically do. 

    One of the most insidious aspects of today's political arena is the tens and hundreds of millions of dollars being spent without any indication of where the money originated from.

  • Sam Abuelsamid

    +Steven Barrett  I think the problem is that a lot of people are not that well informed. It's not so much a case of individuals being afraid of getting fired for voting against what there boss wants, but rather the larger picture of believing what their bosses say and how the election outcome will affect the economy as a whole. 

  • Sam Abuelsamid

    +Steven Barrett  I think the problem is that a lot of people are not that well informed. It's not so much a case of individuals being afraid of getting fired for voting against what there boss wants, but rather the larger picture of believing what their bosses say and how the election outcome will affect the economy as a whole.