If a similar case came before the current US Supreme Court, how many here think that a similarly wise and well reasoned ruling would result?
Reshared post from +Bob Goyetche
"The internet cannot, in short, provide access to information without hyperlinks. Limiting their usefulness by subjecting them to the traditional publication rule would have the effect of seriously restricting the flow of information and, as a result, freedom of expression.."
Nice ! I know a few people this is too late to help, but it's nice to see it there now..
Embedded Link
Internet links not libel, top court rules – Politics – CBC News
The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that hyperlinking to defamatory material on the internet is not the same as publishing the material itself.
Google+: View post on Google+
Post imported by Google+Blog. Created By Daniel Treadwell.