<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: 2010 Chevy Camaro RS V6</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sam.abuelsamid.com/2009/09/04/review-2010-chevy-camaro-rs-v6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sam.abuelsamid.com/2009/09/04/review-2010-chevy-camaro-rs-v6/</link>
	<description>Random thoughts from a random mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 06:48:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mosqueda</title>
		<link>http://sam.abuelsamid.com/2009/09/04/review-2010-chevy-camaro-rs-v6/comment-page-1/#comment-7249</link>
		<dc:creator>mosqueda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 18:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1235334059#comment-7249</guid>
		<description>I rented a Camaro a few weeks ago while on a business trip.  Obviously it looks great.  But the main thing that stuck with me was the incredibly horrible visibility.  It was truly difficult to change lanes with full confidence things were clear.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The car does go.  I switched off the traction control, mashed the brake to the floor, followed by doing the same with the accelerator.  The result:  a cloud of smoke that would do Jeremy Clarkson proud.  Like Jezzer, I&#039;m no fan of flappy paddle shifters.  I&#039;ve used them in several cars, namely the M3.  I don&#039;t like them.  The Camaro doesn&#039;t even have flappy paddles as you point out.  They are a gimmick on this car.  The 6-speed automatic is pretty nice if you have to have an automatic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For Chevy, a good effort that fan boys will pay for.  Did you see Fifth Gear&#039;s test of the Camaro?  Apparently these are being imported into the UK:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1f1ExEOuA5g&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1f1ExEOuA5g&lt;/a&gt;  (there is more than one story, the 1st part is on drifting, followed by the Camaro)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rented a Camaro a few weeks ago while on a business trip.  Obviously it looks great.  But the main thing that stuck with me was the incredibly horrible visibility.  It was truly difficult to change lanes with full confidence things were clear.  </p>
<p>The car does go.  I switched off the traction control, mashed the brake to the floor, followed by doing the same with the accelerator.  The result:  a cloud of smoke that would do Jeremy Clarkson proud.  Like Jezzer, I&#39;m no fan of flappy paddle shifters.  I&#39;ve used them in several cars, namely the M3.  I don&#39;t like them.  The Camaro doesn&#39;t even have flappy paddles as you point out.  They are a gimmick on this car.  The 6-speed automatic is pretty nice if you have to have an automatic.</p>
<p>For Chevy, a good effort that fan boys will pay for.  Did you see Fifth Gear&#39;s test of the Camaro?  Apparently these are being imported into the UK:  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1f1ExEOuA5g" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1f1ExEOuA5g</a>  (there is more than one story, the 1st part is on drifting, followed by the Camaro)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tattoo</title>
		<link>http://sam.abuelsamid.com/2009/09/04/review-2010-chevy-camaro-rs-v6/comment-page-1/#comment-7248</link>
		<dc:creator>tattoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 23:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1235334059#comment-7248</guid>
		<description>You have a nice blog Present, I bookmarks you blog now !&lt;br&gt;Please visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://auto2review.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Car New Reviews, Car 2010 News, New Car Photo&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;and &lt;a href=&quot;http://tattoo-gallery-design.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;tattoo design, popular tattoo, new style tattoo, hot girls tattoo&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have a nice blog Present, I bookmarks you blog now !<br />Please visit <a href="http://auto2review.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow"><b>Car New Reviews, Car 2010 News, New Car Photo</b></a><br />and <a href="http://tattoo-gallery-design.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow"><b>tattoo design, popular tattoo, new style tattoo, hot girls tattoo</b></a></p>
<p>Thx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenhoward</title>
		<link>http://sam.abuelsamid.com/2009/09/04/review-2010-chevy-camaro-rs-v6/comment-page-1/#comment-7247</link>
		<dc:creator>kenhoward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 14:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1235334059#comment-7247</guid>
		<description>It is not often that I will get behind the wheel of a new car, then feel like immediately getting out again. That&#039;s how the new Camaro&#039;s interior environment with its lack of outward visibility struck me, and while it looks gorgeous - from the outside - that is not enough for me to enjoy the drive. It will be the &#039;11 Mustang for me (I savored every word of the exquisite &quot;Deep Dive&quot; writeup at Autoblog!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not often that I will get behind the wheel of a new car, then feel like immediately getting out again. That&#39;s how the new Camaro&#39;s interior environment with its lack of outward visibility struck me, and while it looks gorgeous &#8211; from the outside &#8211; that is not enough for me to enjoy the drive. It will be the &#39;11 Mustang for me (I savored every word of the exquisite &#8220;Deep Dive&#8221; writeup at Autoblog!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ianholmes2010</title>
		<link>http://sam.abuelsamid.com/2009/09/04/review-2010-chevy-camaro-rs-v6/comment-page-1/#comment-7243</link>
		<dc:creator>ianholmes2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1235334059#comment-7243</guid>
		<description>I owned a 1984 Z28 Camaro with all options and loved its&#039; raw power. It was a decent car but only had 190HP. I owned a 1998 Mustang GT Convertible and loved its&#039; punch and expressive exhaust note. It has a respectable 225HP. They were both great pony cars but the Mustang handled better as it was smaller and 14 years newer/modern. I recently purchased a 2010 Camaro, 6cylinder, 6 speed auto. I find it extremely quick with tons of torque for it&#039;s size and weight. It is far superior to my 84 Camaro and my 98 Mustang in every way except for exhaust note. The exhaust note of the Camaro 6.0 liter V8 was fierce and the exhaust note of the Mustang 4.6 liter V8 was mean and sensuous. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, both the 84 Camaro and the 98 Mustang had terribly noisy cabins and hoppy back ends. Neither car was competitive with a european sports car but they could lay down rubber like no european car under $25,000 could at the time. The 2010 Camaro is throughly modern by comparison. I test drove the 2010 Mustang in manual and automatic V6 and V8 and found them to be fun drives but not inspiring in any way what so ever. They have not progressed much form my 98 Mustang. They are a good choice for someone who has never owned a pony car and doesn&#039;t have much money to spend. The Mustang will do the job for a newbie but not for someone who&#039;s been around awhile. After having lived with the 2010 Camaro I can report that the car excites from the sheet metal to the throttle pedal. The interior is nothing to get excited about but it isn&#039;t distracting either. People who are passionate about cars usually fall in love with a car for a combination of styling and performance. The 2010 Camaro arguably has the best exterior styling of any sub $40,000 car and gives you the most bang for the buck. Heads turn when a 2010 Camaro drives by and that&#039;s something that just doesn&#039;t happen when a Mustang or Charger or Challenger drives down the road. The 2010 Camaro is a rocket in any engine configuration and handles well enough for 98% of the people who will purchase one. One aspect of the car that is often overlooked is that the cabin is dead quiet in the V6 and reasonably quiet in the V8. This is vast improvement over old Camaro&#039;s and Mustangs alike. When money was no object I chose the 2010 Camaro because it&#039;s the right car for fun, performance, beauty and everyday driving. If you do track days, then you should buy a Shelby or Saleen Mustang or wait until Chevy builds a Camaro Z28 which will likely be a V6 with twin turbos.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Happy driving!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I owned a 1984 Z28 Camaro with all options and loved its&#39; raw power. It was a decent car but only had 190HP. I owned a 1998 Mustang GT Convertible and loved its&#39; punch and expressive exhaust note. It has a respectable 225HP. They were both great pony cars but the Mustang handled better as it was smaller and 14 years newer/modern. I recently purchased a 2010 Camaro, 6cylinder, 6 speed auto. I find it extremely quick with tons of torque for it&#39;s size and weight. It is far superior to my 84 Camaro and my 98 Mustang in every way except for exhaust note. The exhaust note of the Camaro 6.0 liter V8 was fierce and the exhaust note of the Mustang 4.6 liter V8 was mean and sensuous. </p>
<p>However, both the 84 Camaro and the 98 Mustang had terribly noisy cabins and hoppy back ends. Neither car was competitive with a european sports car but they could lay down rubber like no european car under $25,000 could at the time. The 2010 Camaro is throughly modern by comparison. I test drove the 2010 Mustang in manual and automatic V6 and V8 and found them to be fun drives but not inspiring in any way what so ever. They have not progressed much form my 98 Mustang. They are a good choice for someone who has never owned a pony car and doesn&#39;t have much money to spend. The Mustang will do the job for a newbie but not for someone who&#39;s been around awhile. After having lived with the 2010 Camaro I can report that the car excites from the sheet metal to the throttle pedal. The interior is nothing to get excited about but it isn&#39;t distracting either. People who are passionate about cars usually fall in love with a car for a combination of styling and performance. The 2010 Camaro arguably has the best exterior styling of any sub $40,000 car and gives you the most bang for the buck. Heads turn when a 2010 Camaro drives by and that&#39;s something that just doesn&#39;t happen when a Mustang or Charger or Challenger drives down the road. The 2010 Camaro is a rocket in any engine configuration and handles well enough for 98% of the people who will purchase one. One aspect of the car that is often overlooked is that the cabin is dead quiet in the V6 and reasonably quiet in the V8. This is vast improvement over old Camaro&#39;s and Mustangs alike. When money was no object I chose the 2010 Camaro because it&#39;s the right car for fun, performance, beauty and everyday driving. If you do track days, then you should buy a Shelby or Saleen Mustang or wait until Chevy builds a Camaro Z28 which will likely be a V6 with twin turbos.</p>
<p>Happy driving!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ianholmes2010</title>
		<link>http://sam.abuelsamid.com/2009/09/04/review-2010-chevy-camaro-rs-v6/comment-page-1/#comment-7240</link>
		<dc:creator>ianholmes2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 06:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1235334059#comment-7240</guid>
		<description>I owned a 1984 Z28 Camaro with all options and loved its&#039; raw power. It was a decent car but only had 190HP. I owned a 1998 Mustang GT Convertible and loved its&#039; punch and expressive exhaust note. It has a respectable 225HP. They were both great pony cars but the Mustang handled better as it was smaller and 14 years newer/modern. I recently purchased a 2010 Camaro, 6cylinder, 6 speed auto. I find it extremely quick with tons of torque for it&#039;s size and weight. It is far superior to my 84 Camaro and my 98 Mustang in every way except for exhaust note. The exhaust note of the Camaro 6.0 liter V8 was fierce and the exhaust note of the Camaro 4.6 liter V8 was mean and sensuous. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, both the 84 Camaro and the 98 Mustang had terribly noisy cabins and hoppy back ends. Neither car was competitive with a european sports car but they could lay down rubber like no european car under $25,000 could at the time. The 2010 Camaro is throughly modern by comparison. I test drove the 2010 Mustang in manual and automatic V6 and V8 and found them to be fun drives but not inspiring in any way what so ever. They have not progressed much form my 98 Mustang. They are a good choice for someone who has never owned a pony car and doesn&#039;t have much money to spend. The Mustang will do the job for a newbie but not for someone who&#039;s been around awhile. After having lived with the 2010 Camaro I can report that the car excites from the sheet metal to the throttle pedal. The interior is nothing to get excited about but it isn&#039;t distracting either. People who are passionate about cars usually fall in love with a car for a combination of styling and performance. The 2010 Camaro arguably has the best exterior styling of any sub $40,000 car and gives you the most bang for the buck. Heads turn when a 2010 Camaro drives by and that&#039;s something that just doesn&#039;t happen when a Mustang or Charger or Challenger drives down the road. The 2010 Camaro is a rocket in any engine configuration and handles well enough for 98% of the people who will purchase one. One aspect of the car that is often overlooked is that the cabin is dead quiet in the V6 and reasonably quiet in the V8. This is vast improvement over old Camaro&#039;s and Mustangs alike. When money was no object I chose the 2010 Camaro because it&#039;s the right car for fun, performance, beauty and everyday driving. If you do track days, then you should by a Shelby or Saleen Mustang or wait until Chevy builds a Camaro Z28 which will likely be a V6 with twin turbos.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Happy driving!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I owned a 1984 Z28 Camaro with all options and loved its&#39; raw power. It was a decent car but only had 190HP. I owned a 1998 Mustang GT Convertible and loved its&#39; punch and expressive exhaust note. It has a respectable 225HP. They were both great pony cars but the Mustang handled better as it was smaller and 14 years newer/modern. I recently purchased a 2010 Camaro, 6cylinder, 6 speed auto. I find it extremely quick with tons of torque for it&#39;s size and weight. It is far superior to my 84 Camaro and my 98 Mustang in every way except for exhaust note. The exhaust note of the Camaro 6.0 liter V8 was fierce and the exhaust note of the Camaro 4.6 liter V8 was mean and sensuous. </p>
<p>However, both the 84 Camaro and the 98 Mustang had terribly noisy cabins and hoppy back ends. Neither car was competitive with a european sports car but they could lay down rubber like no european car under $25,000 could at the time. The 2010 Camaro is throughly modern by comparison. I test drove the 2010 Mustang in manual and automatic V6 and V8 and found them to be fun drives but not inspiring in any way what so ever. They have not progressed much form my 98 Mustang. They are a good choice for someone who has never owned a pony car and doesn&#39;t have much money to spend. The Mustang will do the job for a newbie but not for someone who&#39;s been around awhile. After having lived with the 2010 Camaro I can report that the car excites from the sheet metal to the throttle pedal. The interior is nothing to get excited about but it isn&#39;t distracting either. People who are passionate about cars usually fall in love with a car for a combination of styling and performance. The 2010 Camaro arguably has the best exterior styling of any sub $40,000 car and gives you the most bang for the buck. Heads turn when a 2010 Camaro drives by and that&#39;s something that just doesn&#39;t happen when a Mustang or Charger or Challenger drives down the road. The 2010 Camaro is a rocket in any engine configuration and handles well enough for 98% of the people who will purchase one. One aspect of the car that is often overlooked is that the cabin is dead quiet in the V6 and reasonably quiet in the V8. This is vast improvement over old Camaro&#39;s and Mustangs alike. When money was no object I chose the 2010 Camaro because it&#39;s the right car for fun, performance, beauty and everyday driving. If you do track days, then you should by a Shelby or Saleen Mustang or wait until Chevy builds a Camaro Z28 which will likely be a V6 with twin turbos.</p>
<p>Happy driving!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmyZ28</title>
		<link>http://sam.abuelsamid.com/2009/09/04/review-2010-chevy-camaro-rs-v6/comment-page-1/#comment-7238</link>
		<dc:creator>jimmyZ28</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1235334059#comment-7238</guid>
		<description>i drove a mustang GT and frankly it sucks compared to the camaro , you really dont know what your talking about</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i drove a mustang GT and frankly it sucks compared to the camaro , you really dont know what your talking about</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
